Tuesday, October 04, 2005

Supreme Questions

So Bush has appointed a replacement for Sandra Day O'Connor and the reaction is interesting. Hardcore conservatives aren't happy. I'm usually pretty cool with any news that pisses off those assclowns. Could it be that Bush knows he doesn't have the popularity to try to put some wingnut extremist on the bench? Could the fact that she was chosen for her loyalty rather than her experience make her more dangerous? Is the lack of experience just a ploy to put in a wingnut who doesn't have a record she would have to answer to? Will her confirmation hearings give us an opportunity to see the republicans tear each other apart? If she doesn't get confirmed, is there somebody worse waiting in the wings?

We shall have to wait and see what becomes of this. In the meantime, this ought to put a smile on your faces... Tom Delay indicted on 2 more counts!


Blogger CSC5502D said...


your liberal, tolerant, peaceloving liberal in action folks!

I always love that. Liberals are the peaceful, tolerant, open-minded ones and Republicans are the closed-minded neanderthals, etc.

Right up until the first thing comes up that liberals don't like.

Call us all the names you want. We only need to call you one.


10/04/2005 07:56:00 AM  
Blogger Liberal Traitor said...

Why should I be tolerant of wingnuttery and assclownery? Being right wing is a choice. It's not like I'm being intolerant of people for things beyond their control like their race or sexual orientation.

10/04/2005 08:52:00 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home